selfimmolates: (ne. 14.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
[...]

You'll have to wait until this week is over and the new rule lifts, unless you feel like learning firsthand what happens to rule-breakers.

More importantly, what's in it for me? Besides staying low on your list, of course.
selfimmolates: (ne. 5.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 03:14 am (UTC)(link)
[huh.]

... Whatever on the list? And how would you do that?
selfimmolates: (ne. 2.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
[a snort.]

Got it. Likewise, for the record. [...] But sure. I can work with those conditions.
selfimmolates: (ne. 1.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
[he pauses.]

Does this mean "no talking to him ever", or...? I mean, I'm fine with it regardless, but I'd like to know what counts as breaking the condition.
selfimmolates: (ne. 17.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 03:56 am (UTC)(link)
[he nods.]

Sure. Though it's not like he and I are close or anything.
selfimmolates: (ne. 1.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 04:26 am (UTC)(link)
Noted. Besides, I'd rather not get too chummy with someone like him, to begin with. No offence.
selfimmolates: (ne. 17.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
[listen he doesn't want to know too much about your brocon issues]

Didn't say he was. But he's still potentially dangerous, right? I have a healthy [questionable] sense of self-preservation, so I'm fine with our current cordial-but-distant association.

It shouldn't pose a problem to you either.
selfimmolates: (ne. 2.)

[personal profile] selfimmolates 2019-02-20 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
[he was pretty much expecting the threat, so it doesn't throw him off.]

Understood.